[113929] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Operators List (which also covers 6to4 operation ;
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shin SHIRAHATA)
Fri Apr 24 01:36:25 2009
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:35:34 +0900
From: Shin SHIRAHATA <true@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
In-Reply-To: <49EFF032.4070303@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Shin SHIRAHATA wrote:
> >>> 192.88.99.0/24, 2002::/16, and 2001::/32 are some
> >>> notable examples of heterogeneous origin AS.
> >> And those prefixes (6to4 & Teredo) all come with annoying problems as
> >> one never knows which relay is really being used and it is hard to debug
> >> how the packets really flow.
> >
> > I agree entirely.
> >
> > As a one of 6to4 relay operator (AS38646), I believe coordination among
> > 6to4 and Teredo operators is needed.
> >
> > Does anyone know is there any operators group who are using
> > 192.88.99.0/24, 2002::/16, and 2001::/32?
>
> See http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/
> Next to that: whois -h whois.ripe.net RFC3068-MNT
> that at at least should give you all the European 6to4 operators directly.
Thank you for you information :)
RFC3068-MNT is very interesting. Can non-Europian operator register
this mainter object? If not, similar system in other region?
Cheers,
Shin
---
No caffeine, No work.
Shin SHIRAHATA <shin@shirahata.name> / <true@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
