[113902] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF,

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Thu Apr 23 08:17:13 2009

Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:17:07 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49F05ADE.7040908@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009, William Allen Simpson wrote:

> Some wag around here re-christened it the IVTF (V stands for Vendor, not
> Victory). ;-)  I haven't bothered to go in years....

If the people with operational experience stop going, you can't blame the group for
being full of vendors.

Methinks its time a large cabal of network operators should represent
at IETF and make their opinions heard as a collective group.
That would be how change is brought about in a participative organisation,
no? :)



Adrian



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post