[113850] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Wed Apr 22 10:18:13 2009
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
In-Reply-To: <20090422015026.GA11683@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:17:38 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 21-Apr-2009, at 21:50, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 08:24:38PM -0400, Ricky Beam wrote:
>>
>
>> FTP? Who uses FTP these days? Certainly not consumers. Even Cisco
>> pushes almost everything via a webserver. (they still have ftp
>> servers,
>> they just don't put much on them these days.)
>
> well, pretty much anyone who has large datasets to move around.
> that default 64k buffer in the openssl libs pretty much sucks
> rocks for large data flows.
So you're saying FTP with no SSL is better than HTTP with no SSL?
Joe
