[113817] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The real issue
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Apr 21 22:59:30 2009
In-Reply-To: <D32A153A-6343-4259-9396-659DCD7298F7@fattoc.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:59:24 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Shane Ronan <sronan@fattoc.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Shane Ronan <sronan@fattoc.com> wrote:
> It's means one of two things:
>
sure, but 'how' exactly?
> 1) Recoup the unused space for paid reallocation
> or
arin never (nor do any RIR) guarantee routability, nor do they even a
method to affect routability of a network.
> 2) Have the current "owner" pay the market rate for the IP space
>
... that's somewhat hard since the current policies don't support
that, and there is no real legal stance for legacy-allocations... For
allocated post-legacy-times ARIN can start court proceedings, but ...
that's a lengthy process and expensive.
-Chris
>
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Shane Ronan <sronan@fattoc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is ARIN, who won't even take back large blocks of space from people who
>>> have
>>> long ago stopped using it and aren't paying anything for it, prepared to
>>> start filing civil suits against people who were assigned /24's (and paid
>>> for them) due to inaccurate declaration?
>>
>> out of curiousity.. 'take back' means what in this context?
>
>
<div><br></div>
