[113605] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IXP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Fri Apr 17 10:19:44 2009
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:18:12 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: "Sharlon R. Carty" <me@sharloncarty.net>
In-Reply-To: <be487e8b0904170711u500136cfl74977a9d4d0587ba@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:11:30AM -0400, Sharlon R. Carty wrote:
> Hello NANOG,
>
> I like would to know what are best practices for an internet exchange. I
> have some concerns about the following;
> Can the IXP members use RFC 1918 ip addresses for their peering?
> Can the IXP members use private autonomous numbers for their peering?
>
> Maybe the answer is obviuos, but I like to know from any IXP admins what
> their setup/experiences have been.
>
> --
> --sharlon
15 years into the exchange trade has given me the following insights:
RFC1918 space can be used - but virtually everyone who starts there
migrates to globally unique space.
Private ASNs - same deal. Private ASNs tend to have special treatment
inside ISPs - so path matching gets you in the end.
--bill
