[113377] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Vandalism Likely In Big South Bay Phone Outage
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Fri Apr 10 12:03:28 2009
In-Reply-To: <E1LsGvl-000BLG-Pi@s0.nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:01:13 -0400
From: Martin Hannigan <martin@theicelandguy.com>
To: Bob Bradlee <Bob@bradlee.org>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
The reward is effective and the one of the best uses of their funds in
responding to this event. More outside plant spending is not effective
when you are dealing with motivated individuals.
I'd like to reemphasize that you can't spend enough on outside or
inside plant to stop this type of thing. It is much more cost
effective to stalk the executors with rewards and prosecution as a
detterent.
Best,
Martin
On 4/10/09, Bob Bradlee <Bob@bradlee.org> wrote:
>
> Sounds to me like an ongoing dispute may be close to the bottom of this.
>
> http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/04/06/att-union-contract-expires-threat-to-cap-ex/
>
> AT&T's answer is to place a $100k bounty on the vandals.
>
> The other Bob
>
>
>
>
>
--
Martin Hannigan martin@theicelandguy.com
p: +16178216079
Power, Network, and Costs Consulting for Iceland Datacenters and Occupants
