[113179] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wow,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Apr 5 17:16:03 2009
To: Michael Barker <mbarker@cyrusnetworks.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:58:50 EDT."
<99D09C7C026C2942AAE6F2E7EC01CDC91CD4407DE4@Server12.cmh.cyrusnetworks.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 17:13:56 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, Jeff Young <young@jsyoung.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1238966036_4404P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:58:50 EDT, Michael Barker said:
> Seems like they're following up on Department of Defense Directive 8570.01,
> whereas all Information Assurance personnel (that being defined as anyone
> with privileged access) are required to be certified.
Sort of what I was worried about - "Providers of cybersecurity services" and
"has privileged access" aren't exactly the same thing.
--==_Exmh_1238966036_4404P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFJ2R8UcC3lWbTT17ARArWLAKD5tqdZ3FaM5Z0iD5vbv4sS33irmgCg6zB/
nnxvpVk5ulncxNFjryDuZYQ=
=4Md5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1238966036_4404P--
