[113154] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wow, just when you though big government was someone else's
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Sat Apr 4 12:40:21 2009
In-Reply-To: <B81B7B64-4D80-491E-8F8B-936C1C9CF62D@jsyoung.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 22:08:16 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Young <young@jsyoung.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Jeff Young <young@jsyoung.net> wrote:
> Read it again. =C2=A0It says all government networks and any network the
> president deems vital, I'd have to assume that would at least be all of t=
he
> major backbones.
Deeming something vital / critical has a whole lot of extra baggage
attached to it. Check out for example the OECD surveys on critical
information infrastructure.
a. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/49/28/40839436.pdf - OECD Seoul Declaration
for the Future of the Internet Economy,
b. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/10/40761118.pdf - comparative study of
CIIP in OECD economies (Australia, Canada, Korea, Japan, The Netherlands,
the United Kingdom and the United States)
--srs