[113109] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco ASR100x
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mohacsi Janos)
Thu Apr 2 04:55:02 2009
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:52:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
To: Dan Snyder <sliplever@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6C9CA4EF-939B-4B9C-A794-976F900279D6@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi,
Our summmarized experiences can be found here:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2009-March/059409.html
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Dan Snyder wrote:
> We have two of them and we haven't been able to keep them in production,
> either because of bugs or lack of QoS features.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Bill Blackford <BBlackford@nwresd.k12.or.us>
> wrote:
>
>> Anyone on the list have any experience with ASR1000 series and IOS XE? From
>> what I've read, Cisco is attempting to move to a more modular software as
>> JUNOS has been doing for some time.
>>
>> I am curious about the reliability and stability of the platform. I am also
>> interested in the differences in the IOS XE vs. IOS.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -b
>>
>> --
>> Bill Blackford
>>
>>
>
