[113074] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google Over IPV6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Tue Mar 31 19:14:20 2009
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:11:46 -0700
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <49CCF9F7.8050704@foobar.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 27/03/2009 15:26, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>> AFAIK you have to have native peering with them to be part of the
>> pilot. At least, you did when we signed up. They may have relaxed
>> that since.
>
> According to a Google IPv6 talk I attended yesterday, they don't intend
> to relax that rule. Tunneling ipv6 connectivity over ipv4 is trash
> quality engineering and to be honest, its not a credible substitute for
> adequate ipv6 infrastructure.
<facetious>
Tunneling ipv4 over mpls is trash quality engineering and it's not a
credible substitute for adequate ipv4 infrastructure.
</facetious>
Everything is a tunnel...
> Nick
>
