[113038] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Google Over IPV6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Teun Vink)
Mon Mar 30 05:42:32 2009
From: Teun Vink <teun@moonblade.net>
To: "Robert D. Scott" <robert@ufl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <016c01c9aeed$2245ed20$66d1c760$@edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:40:31 +0200
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, 'Grzegorz Janoszka' <Grzegorz@Janoszka.pl>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 11:03 -0400, Robert D. Scott wrote:
> Their press would indicate that more than www is IPV6.
>
> When I posted my original note, I was not really looking for end user
> feedback, but rather is anyone peering V6 with them on either a public
> fabric or private peer. Any idea if they have native V6 transit, or are
> tunneling, and to where.
Yes, for example reader, maps, picasa and gmail have IPv6 enabled as
well. Groups, youtube and orkut don't have IPv6 enabled, it seems.
Funny thing to see is that IPv6 latency is lower than the IPv4 latency:
--- www.l.google.com ping6 statistics ---
54 packets transmitted, 54 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 8.302/9.038/12.639/0.989 ms
--- www.l.google.com ping statistics ---
57 packets transmitted, 57 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 13.780/15.739/35.764/4.055 ms
Regards,
Teun
