[113029] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Confiker Virus.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Sun Mar 29 20:13:42 2009
In-Reply-To: <483E6B0272B0284BA86D7596C40D29F9BBBD6DE3B5@PUR-EXCH07.ox.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:11:12 -0700
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com> wrote:
> SRI has a detailed analysis of conflicker at
> http://mtc.sri.com/Conficker/
>
The most relevant section the Conficker.C addendum -- this has been driving
the April 1st hype.
http://mtc.sri.com/Conficker/addendumC/index.html
FYI,
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
wj8DBQFJ0A4Uq1pz9mNUZTMRAlJbAJ9g8PgK+ttTz193mUTRzxhdN47QgQCdEASn
hKy+B8H9BHprgaVpFKGIv0I=
=RSKj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/