[113006] in North American Network Operators' Group
iBGP Scaling
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (tt tt)
Sat Mar 28 13:16:06 2009
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:13:54 +0000 (GMT)
From: tt tt <tt_745@yahoo.co.uk>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi List,=0A=0AWe are looking to move our non infrastructure routes into iBG=
P to help with our IGP scalability (OSPF). We already run full BGP tables =
on our core where we connect to multiple upstream and downstream customers.=
Most of our aggregation and edge routers cannot hold full tables and it's=
certainly not possible to upgrade them. Is there any reason why we shouldn=
't filter iBGP routes between our core and aggregation layers (we plan to u=
se route reflectors) or should we be look at using a private AS number per =
POP?=0A=0AThanks=0A=0ADave=0A=0A=0A=0A
