[112958] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: First steps towards v6 support by ATT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Thu Mar 26 22:17:49 2009
In-Reply-To: <49CC2AA2.9090506@thewybles.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:15:42 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Charles Wyble <charles@thewybles.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Charles Wyble <charles@thewybles.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> yea... maybe they do, I don't see that from my view of 7018's routing
>> data (limited as it may be)
>
> Interesting.
so, actually, looking at 7018's route-server:
route-server> sho ip bgp 192.88.99.1 | in recei
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
seems they prefer Sprint for 6to4 services... 7132 doesn't have a
publicly listed route-server :( oh well.
-chris
