|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:35:49 -0400 From: John Peach <john-nanog@johnpeach.com> To: nanog@merit.edu In-reply-to: <20090325115220.25451.qmail@simone.iecc.com> Reply-To: nanog@merit.edu Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On 25 Mar 2009 11:52:20 -0000 John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote: > >> And yes indeed, its a way for us to automate termination of > >> spammers, and to discover other patterns (in signup methods / spam > >> content etc) that we can use to update our filters. > > > >That's a great theory. Would you be willing to post an update to > >this list if and when your technology and automation actually get to > >the point of actually shutting down a spammer? > > Um, perhaps this would be a good time to do a little background > research and see who Suresh is and what he does. > Indeed it would; I know from experience that Suresh's automation works. -- John
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |