[112871] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Usage-Based Billing for DIA
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jon Lewis)
Tue Mar 24 13:02:31 2009
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:00:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>
To: Sam Stickland <sam_mailinglists@spacething.org>
In-Reply-To: <49B4E1A6.8040905@spacething.org>
Cc: "Rodriguez, Mauricio" <Mauricio.Rodriguez@fpl.com>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Sam Stickland wrote:
>> I need to look into this in the near future as well. The problems I'm
>> aware of are:
>>
>> 1) we have customers on policed ports, and the interface snmp counters
>> count packets before service-policy. It doesn't seem right to bill for
>> packets we dropped :)...so this isn't useful data for billing purposes.
>>
> Torrus (www.torrus.org) can use the Cisco MIBs to graph pre and post-policy
> packets.
>
> http://www.torrus.org/plugins/tp-cisco-cbqos.pod.html
I just checked a few 3550s and 3560s, and I don't see any evidence that
they support CISCO-CLASS-BASED-QOS-MIB. Walking .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166, I
get nothing. On our 6500s, walking .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166, I do get lots of
data, but I don't see anything obvious in it that tells me which numbers
go with which interfaces.
Is anyone actually making use of CISCO-CLASS-BASED-QOS-MIB on 3550s to
graph/bill traffic passed after per-interface policing service policies
are applied?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
