[112492] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

ISP network re-design feedback requested

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Bertrand)
Sat Feb 28 15:30:46 2009

Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:30:27 -0500
From: Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

Hi everyone,

Hopefully my question is operational 'enough' to be asked here, as I
don't know of any other place to ask...

Still trying to redesign (as-I-go) our ISP network, I've realized that
we are not large enough to deploy a full three layer approach (core,
dist, acc), so I'm trying to consolidate, with the ability to scale if
necessary. I also want full network reachability if I need to take any
one router off-line for upgrade or replacement purposes.

Given the following diagram (forgive me, it was drafted rather quickly
with Visio, and just dumped onto a web box), I'm hoping for advice on
whether I'm leaning the right way.

http://ibctech.ca/p-ce.html

What I want:

- ability to take a router off-line for upgrade, and not be concerned
about reachability issues if the lab-tested procedure fails miserably on
production gear
- a relatively easy way to keep traffic control measures at the
access/edge (ACLs, uRPF, RTBH etc)
- the 'core' free of interface ACLs (if possible), only running
filtering ingress to the process-switch environment
- the ability to scale without having to have a full mesh with all PE
routers

What I have:

- numerous CPE routers connected to a CE switch that multi-homes into
two different routers at two different locations in our access layer
- an access layer that has no routers capable of a full BGP table (well,
v4 that is)
- a core layer that can handle full tables
- a network access layer on the north side of the diagram that you can't
see, with the same type of setup, but with full v4 routing tables being
announced in
- the access layer provides def-orig to CPE routers
- the PE protects the CE from becoming transit

What I am thinking

- use the core routers as route-reflectors to the PE access routers,
including a def-orig where it applies (to remain scalable, until PE can
be replaced to hold full routes)
- the PE routers send def-orig on to the CE sites
- stop thinking about every network like it is an 'enterprise' network
- look at most of my ISP environment as 'access clients', instead of
always seeing my ISP as everything in my buildings. See the ISP as a
'network provider', and then realize the rest are just access 'clients':

-- the 'hosting provider'
-- the 'collocation provider'
-- the 'Internet provider'
-- the 'email provider'
-- ect

There is much, much more, but feedback on the above setup will get me
going on the proper path...

Steve





home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post