|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:57:18 +0000 From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0902261342250.60766@simone.iecc.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, John R. Levine wrote: > > Sounds like it might be time to reconsider your mailing list config. A decade > ago, bandwidth was really expensive and it made sense to try to load up lots > of recipients per delivery. These days it's essentially free, and any saving > in bandwidth is swamped by the extra manual effort of having to do bounce > management by hand. Mailman's bounce parser is clever enough that there's no manualarity. AOL's ARF redaction also causes problems identifying problem .forwarders. I don't understand what they are trying to defend against. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |