[11234] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Terminating many T1's
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tom Eastgard)
Wed Jul 23 12:25:27 1997
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 08:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Eastgard <eastgard@nwnet.net>
To: David Mercer <dmercer@world.std.com>
cc: "Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI" <blkirk@float.eli.net>,
Stephen Balbach <stephen@clark.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.95.970723011314.13577A-100000@world.std.com>
On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, David Mercer wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, Stephen Balbach wrote:
>
> > > 4. Chanellized DS3. Don't know anything about it - can MFS provide circuits
> > > this way via a DS3 handoff? No CSU/DSU required? Any other costs/issues?
> > Channelized DS3 stuff only seems to be useful for putting mulitple
> > customers on a single physical circuit. You need to be able to break it
> > out to the DS1 level for each customer. Perhaps MFS, PacBell, etc can do
> > this? It's probably just a matter of them defining that "product".
> > (I.E. Feed MFS a DS3 and they give a T1 to each of your customers.)
>
> US West !nterprise sells such a service, only for frame relay connections.
Not quite true. We have two CT3's on order from USWest (not !nterprize)
for plain-ol' T1 aggragation...this in the WA/OR area.
TE
