[11229] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Denninger)
Wed Jul 23 10:25:16 1997
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 09:13:08 -0500
From: Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>
To: Eric Germann <ekgermann@cctec.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970723095312.006cc7c8@207.87.243.20>; from Eric Germann on Wed, Jul 23, 1997 at 09:53:42AM -0400
On Wed, Jul 23, 1997 at 09:53:42AM -0400, Eric Germann wrote:
> would an anti-kashpureff bgp feed fix the dns pollution problems similar to
> the anti spam black list. If yes, is it collusion which would be
> prosecutable? If no, what are the TECHNICAL reasons it wouldn't work.
>
> Eric
No, because *ANY* nameserver which gets the pollution can then pollute you.
Since you can't cut off EVERY nameserver with such a feed, it is pointless
to attempt it.
--
--
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
http://www.mcs.net/~karl | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
| 99 Analog numbers, 77 ISDN, http://www.mcs.net/
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| NOW Serving 56kbps DIGITAL on our analog lines!
Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | 2 FULL DS-3 Internet links; 400Mbps B/W Internal
