[112172] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: do I need to maintain with RADB?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Vegoda)
Thu Feb 19 19:04:52 2009

From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org>
To: Zaid Ali <zaid@zaidali.com>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:01:59 -0800
In-Reply-To: <9100725.1431235074175800.JavaMail.zaid@turing-2.local>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On 19/02/2009 12:09, "Zaid Ali" <zaid@zaidali.com> wrote:

> Hi, need some advise here. Do I still need to maintain my objects (and pa=
y)
> RADB? I use ARIN as source and all my route objects can be verified with =
a
> whois.

If you are happy using a RR which appears to only rely on a MAIL-FROM auth
scheme then the ARIN RR is fine. If you'd like to have a stronger auth
scheme available you might want to look at RADB.

Leo=20



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post