[112140] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: real hardware router VS linux router
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Warren)
Thu Feb 19 15:07:53 2009
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:09:31 -0500
From: William Warren <hescominsoon@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <499D6E99.1090706@uiuc.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 2/19/2009 9:37 AM, Ryan Harden wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> While you could probably build a linux router that is just as fast as a
> real hardware router, you're always going to run into the moving pieces
> part of the equation.
>
> In almost all scenarios, moving parts are more prone to failure than
> non-moving parts.
>
> Regardless of what you find out in your research, consider the above in
> your cost-benefit analysis.
>
> /Ryan
>
> Deric Kwok wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> Actually, what is the different hardware router VS linux router?
>>
>> Have you had experience to compare real router eg: cisco VS linux router?
>>
>> eg: streaming speed... tcp / udp
>>
>> Thank you for your information
>>
>
> - --
> Ryan M. Harden, BS, KC9IHX Office: 217-265-5192
> CITES - Network Engineering Cell: 630-363-0365
> 2130 Digital Computer Lab Fax: 217-244-7089
> 1304 W. Springfield email: hardenrm@illinois.edu
> Urbana, IL 61801
>
> University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
> University of Illinois - ICCN
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmdbpcACgkQtuPckBBbXboREgCguTikt2UwEIRHNfoNzASreLD/
> YLcAoKdr/Gbw8CQuY9dTitvGQdD3+H0s
> =bsHP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
ssd's remove the spindle from the equation..otherwise they both have
fans that do fail.
