[112094] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6 Confusion

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Feb 19 02:55:33 2009

Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:55:15 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <A3C9582B-2951-4285-8A4F-0F710898A42C@virtualized.org>
Cc: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

>  This may be where Randy Bush derives his "IVTF"  label.

not exactly.  see <http://archive.psg.com/051000.ccr-ivtf.pdf>.

> Yes, there have been attempts to bridge the two camps, but I suspect  
> the only way to really address this is a fundamental shift in the way  
> the IETF does business, taking into account the fact that network  
> operators and end users, by and large, are not the implementors of  
> protocols and don't actually care how they are implemented, but rather  
> the folks who define what the protocols need to do.  I'll admit some  
> skepticism that such a change is actually feasible.

standards bodies used to be composed of users meeting to drive vendors
to common specs so the users had freedom of choice and inter-operation.
the ietf has become vendors inventing new and ever more complex features
to drive users to minimal margins.

randy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post