[112092] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Confusion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Thu Feb 19 02:03:37 2009
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:03:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <499CACEF.10507@justinshore.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Justin Shore wrote:
> Adoption of IPv6 would be better in my opinion if vendors didn't force
> us to pay a premium to use IPv6. It's hard enough to convince
> management that there is a need to implement IPv6. It's even harder
> when you tell them how much it costs. And when they ask what they're
> getting for their dollars, they are none to pleased to hear that the
> bulk of it is going to a damn license.
Well, at least some BUs decided that IPv6 should now be included in IPBASE
which lowers the cost of getting basic IPv6 routing up and running.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
