[112069] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Confusion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Wed Feb 18 17:51:04 2009
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:50:54 +0900
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
In-Reply-To: <A5AE383D-278C-4997-891F-44797287581A@daork.net>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009, Nathan Ward wrote:
> Yep. You asked your vendors to support equivalent IPv6 things at the
> time though, so when you roll out IPv6 the support is ready, right?
>
> The point is that these deficiencies exist in IPv4, and I'm not sure
> how you would solve them in IPv6 (assuming you can make all the
> changes you want, and get instant industry-wide support) any better
> than you solve them in IPv4.
Who says the IPv6 solutions need to be better than IPv4?
Adrian
