[112052] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Confusion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Wed Feb 18 16:46:24 2009
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:46:15 +0900
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
In-Reply-To: <075b01c99211$71aa3810$54fea830$@net>
Cc: 'nanog list' <nanog@nanog.org>, 'Aria Stewart' <aredridel@nbtsc.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009, Tony Hain wrote:
> No, the decision was to not blindly import all the excess crap from IPv4. If
> anyone has a reason to have a DHCPv6 option, all they need to do is specify
> it. The fact that the *nog community stopped participating in the IETF has
> resulted in the situation where functionality is missing, because nobody
> stood up and did the work to make it happen.
Please explain where you think "*nog" community is today representative
at all of the wider scale IPv6 deployment issues across the world?
I'm assuming IETF and ARIN/RIPE/APNIC/etc are busy talking to end-users
rather than just ISPs about the issues facing IPv6 adoption. Am I
mistaken or not?
Adrian
