[112021] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Confusion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chuck Anderson)
Wed Feb 18 15:09:07 2009
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:08:54 -0500
From: Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <154AAAE4-5F6F-4FFE-B702-40E2FA6A75CA@nbtsc.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:55:19PM -0700, Aria Stewart wrote:
>>
>> On 18/02/2009 19:39, Kevin Loch wrote:
>>> Just how DO we get the message to the IETF that we need all the
>>> tools we
>>> have in v4 (DHCP, VRRP, etc) to work with RA turned off?
>
> What operational reasons are there for working with RA turned off?
I don't want any system to be able to get IPv6 addressing information
until the system has been identified in our central management system.
I also want the IPv6 address assignment to be made centrally.