[112011] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: McAfee/AT&T Issue
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin Krejci)
Wed Feb 18 13:14:55 2009
From: "Justin Krejci" <jkrejci@usinternet.com>
To: <kgasso@visp.net>,
"'Calhoun, Matthew'" <mcalhoun@iodatacenters.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:14:41 -0600
In-Reply-To: <499C4D6E.7040103@visp.net>
Cc: 'NANOG list' <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
We've also seen that busy routers are slower to respond to requests directed
at them as opposed to traffic routing thru them which can continue to work
without issue or performance loss.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kameron Gasso [mailto:kgasso-lists@visp.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 12:03 PM
To: Calhoun, Matthew
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: McAfee/AT&T Issue
Calhoun, Matthew wrote:
> 9 212 ms 200 ms * 12.118.225.22 <--------Problem occurring
here. Sometimes traffic gets through, sometimes it doesn't
> 10 29 ms 26 ms 26 ms 216.143.71.219
> 11 26 ms 26 ms 26 ms www.mcafeeasap.com [208.69.153.135]
Looks a lot like that hop is rate-limiting ICMP to itself. Everything
beyond it seems to be good from the looks of it.
-Kam
