[112003] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 Confusion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TJ)
Wed Feb 18 09:14:18 2009
From: "TJ" <trejrco@gmail.com>
To: "'nanog list'" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <B9CBE009-8DE2-46A5-AD25-36DD0864C7F3@daork.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:14:07 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
>> So we deploy v6 addresses to clients, and save the remaining v4 addresses
for servers. Problem solved?
>I have been suggesting that for a long time.
>
>However I am not suggesting IPv6-only to clients. See my other email on
this
>from a minute or so ago.
>
>The way I see things going in the medium term:
>* IPv4 SP-NAT
>* IPv6 native to clients
+1
Wait, can I vote more than once?
If so, +(more).
<<SNIP>>
