[111997] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6 Confusion

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Wed Feb 18 01:19:02 2009

From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902180632580.16135@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:18:51 -1000
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> Most of the time the vendors don't educate their sales force (both  
> the droids and the sales engineers) about IPv6 because they  
> themselves have made the strategic decision that IPv6 isn't  
> important to them (personal view).

Suggestion: next time you buy equipment from competing vendors, tell  
the sales folk from the losing vendors that one deciding factor was  
(vendor or product) IPv6 support. That (and perhaps only that) will  
get their attention... :-)

> If any CPE NAT box vendor comes around and has 6to4 with proper  
> IPv6, I'll happily recommend all our customers who want IPv6 to buy  
> that perticular box.

Apple Airport Extreme? (Seems to work, but I don't know how standards  
conformant it is)

Regards,
-drc



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post