[111927] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Tue Feb 17 10:07:20 2009
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:05:55 -0500
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
To: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902170755350.24727@efes.iucc.ac.il>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:07:36AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> A regular UN of attempts to do this previously:
>
> 24532 - PT. Inet Global Indo, Indonesia
> 43179 - Team Consulting AS, Bosnia and Herzegovina
> 48262 - Noblecom Ltd., Bulgaria
> 6488 - Arizona Macintosh Users Group, USA
> 39625 - Omni-Araneo, Poland
> 33838 - BetaNET sp. z o.o, Poland
> 47868 - SUPRO, spol. s r.o., Czech Republic
>
> "They" will keep trying and until a vast majority of ISPs implement
> maxas, this will keep happening.
Or until people who are still running multi-year old cisco code
actually upgrade? This seems to primarily impact:
1) Old cisco code
2) PC based bgp daemons
Both of which likely just need to be upgraded. I actually suspect
that a lot of people who dropped their bgp sessions did not notice something
happened, and still will not upgrade their code. I searched the archives, some
variations of this have happened since 2001. There's been a few PSIRT and
other issues since then, I suspect these people don't even know they have a
bgp speaking device anymore.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
