|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> To: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:01:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200902140815.n1E8FCgb032809@drugs.dv.isc.org> (Mark Andrews's message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:15:12 +1100") Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org * Mark Andrews: > In message <ef3daad70902131706x2277ac5fp5cc243ffff354998@mail.gmail.com>, Nathan Malynn writes: >> Question about 2k38: Aren't most Unixoid systems using 64-bit clocks now? > > No. Even if they were you have 32 bit timestamps in lots > of things that have to be handled even if time/time64 returns > a 64 bit timestamp. Those values can often be interpreted as unsigned, so we get another 68 years. By then, hopefully, the required protocol updates can be fully automated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |