[111668] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Network equipments process utilization
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Elmar K. Bins)
Tue Feb 10 04:01:04 2009
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:00:58 +0100
From: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi@4ever.de>
To: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>
Mail-Followup-To: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi@4ever.de>,
Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20090210104955.00b09530@efes.iucc.ac.il>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
hank@efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher) wrote:
> > - slow-CPU boxes like everything Cisco with SUPs, since the
> > CPU load _always_ jumps to 100% for short periods of
> > time - BGP needs something calculated ;-) I get interested
> > whenever CPU load _stays_ high
>
> Yeah - Cisco would like to know why as well:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac50/ac207/crc_new/university/RFP/rfp07026.html
I know ;-)
But: This is not a churn problem, it's a problem of slow CPUs in
allegedly big-and-fast boxes. I'd like a NPE-G2 blade for my
76's, as RP. Still, this is getting off-topic.
Elmar.
