[111651] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Mon Feb 9 21:38:43 2009
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:38:33 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: TJ <trejrco@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <00df01c98b27$3181b7e0$948527a0$@com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
TJ wrote:
> When the compliance explicitly requires something they are required to check
> for it, they don't have the option of ignoring or waving requirements ...
> and off the top of my head I don't recall if it is SOX that calls for
> RFC1918 explicitly but I know there are some that do.
I believe that RFC1918 space won't be a requirement for IPv6. I'm pretty
sure the requirements will change as the addressing changes. Of course,
I'm sure you will have a lot of NEW requirements. :)
Jack
