[111645] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TJ)
Mon Feb 9 21:16:58 2009
From: "TJ" <trejrco@gmail.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200902100022.n1A0MwTc027903@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:16:49 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> The SOX auditor ought to know better. Any auditor that
> requires NAT is incompenent.
Sadly, there are many audit REQUIREMENTS explicitly naming NAT and RFC1918
addressing ...
