[111599] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Feb 9 01:14:28 2009
In-Reply-To: <620fd17c0902082208s27f9c75cpb68d132f24358d3c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:14:25 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Paul Wall <pauldotwall@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG Operators Group <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Paul Wall <pauldotwall@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Aaron Glenn <aaron.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
>> NAT? why isn't Verizon 'It's the Network' Wireless using IPv6?
>> <speaking-from-ass>there should be a FOIA-like method to see large
>> allocation justifications</ass>
>
> Probably because Verizon Business isn't using it, unless you count a
> couple of lab GRE tunnels.
so... actually... if you ask for v6 apparently vzb's deployment is
still moving along and is accessible for customers.
FiOS/DSL though is not :(
-Chris
