[111592] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aaron Glenn)
Sun Feb 8 22:37:15 2009
In-Reply-To: <200902090007.n1907qY2069724@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:37:08 -0800
From: Aaron Glenn <aaron.glenn@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> wrote:
>
> I don't see any reason to complain based on those numbers.
> It's just a extremely high growth period due to technology
> change over bring in new functionality.
so if they don't deploy IPv6 then ('extremely high growth period'),
when will they? I don't presume to speak for everyone who immediately
felt that tinge of surprise at reading of a /9 being allocated, but
the blame is being laid on vzw not doing something other than 'can we
have a /9 please?' --not ARIN and/or it's policies (another mailing
list, duly noted)
