[111588] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aaron Glenn)
Sun Feb 8 17:37:38 2009
In-Reply-To: <16720fe00902072006p1f8d441dpb1dcf58f49021837@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:37:31 -0800
From: Aaron Glenn <aaron.glenn@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Jeffrey Lyon
<jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net> wrote:
> Whatever happened to NAT?
>
> Jeff
NAT? why isn't Verizon 'It's the Network' Wireless using IPv6?
<speaking-from-ass>there should be a FOIA-like method to see large
allocation justifications</ass>
