[111466] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Loiacono)
Fri Feb 6 08:34:57 2009
In-Reply-To: <g3myd0117i.fsf@nsa.vix.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon@csc.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:35:00 -0500
Cc: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> wrote on 02/06/2009 02:20:01 AM:
> the fundamental implication is, forget about address space, it's
paperwork
> now, it's off the table as a negotiating item or any kind of constraint.
> but the size of the routing table is still a bogeyman, and IPv6 arms
that
> bogeyman with nukes.
Indeed it does. And don't forget that the most basic data object in the
routing table, the address itself, is 4 times as big.
Joe
