[111422] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Butterworth)
Thu Feb 5 15:05:22 2009
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:05:13 GMT
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> 4) Obtain PA space and do what you're doing with v4.
> (4) is problematic because filtering long prefixes in v6 seems to be
> more energetic than it is in v4. (5) is problematic if you don't
> qualify for PI space.
Oi, nooo
Lets not recreate the v4 issues by suggesting it's just problematic, it
should not happen.
If you're going to add a prefix at least do it properly get PI, keep
PA as PA only. No PI too hard excuses.
If there were global stricter filtering at allocations then
the hijacking problem would be one less excuse for people
to justify crazy deaggregation
brandon
