[111365] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Wed Feb 4 20:44:44 2009
From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <498A424C.7080400@rollernet.us>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:39:35 +1300
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 5/02/2009, at 2:35 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Far too many people see NAT as synonymous with a firewall so they
> think
> if you take away their NAT you're taking away the security of a
> firewall.
>
> A *lot* of these problems we face are conceptual rather than
> technological.
For more, refer to the 69,000 other NANOG posts on the topic.
--
Nathan Ward
