[110738] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Which is more efficient?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Murphy, Jay, DOH)
Wed Jan 14 17:51:51 2009

Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:56:11 -0700
From: "Murphy, Jay, DOH" <Jay.Murphy@state.nm.us>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


All,

In your humble opinion, which transmission method is more efficient, pack=
et or cell?  Granted a cell is a fixed length packet and an IP packet is =
variable length....would this necessarily only relate to a specific proto=
col,  namely, cell in ATM, and IP in Ethernet or other  types of domains.=
=2E..feedback highly welcomed.  Trying to make a decision on the transpor=
t mode for cost, delay, jitter, ROI, etcetera.


Jay Murphy=20
IP Network Specialist=20
NM Department of Health=20
ITSD - IP Network Operations=20
Santa F=E9, New M=E9xico 87502=20
Bus. Ph.: 505.827.2851

"We move the information that moves your world."=20







































Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including all attachments is for the=
 sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and p=
rivileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distri=
bution is prohibited unless specifically provided under the New Mexico In=
spection of Public Records Act. If you are not the intended recipient, pl=
ease contact the sender and destroy all copies of this message. -- This e=
mail has been scanned by the Sybari - Antigen Email System.=20




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post