[110475] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: question about BGP default routing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (chloe K)
Tue Jan 6 07:41:50 2009
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:40:16 -0500 (EST)
From: chloe K <chloekcy2000@yahoo.ca>
To: Kai Chen <kch670@eecs.northwestern.edu>,
"Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
In-Reply-To: <e81393830901051952g6fdbb29ev5059caa018590ed4@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Sorry I have question
Why it needs default routes when running BGP?
Thank you
Kai Chen <kch670@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
Will this default route 0.0.0.0/0 be exporting to AS-level neighbors?
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Edward B. DREGER
wrote:
> KC> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:05:48 -0600
> KC> From: Kai Chen
>
> KC> is this router using a default routing for all the other
> KC> destinations?
>
> Either that:
>
> router> sh ip route 0.0.0.0
> Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet
>
> or partial tables with no default:
>
> router> sh ip route 0.0.0.0
> % Network not in table
>
> is what you'd expect.
>
>
> Eddy
> --
> Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
> A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
> Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
> Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
> Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
> ________________________________________________________________________
> DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
> davidc@brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq@intc.net -*- sam@everquick.net
> Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
> Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
>
>
---------------------------------
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on the web and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now!
