[110448] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Mon Jan 5 18:46:03 2009
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:45:28 +0800
In-Reply-To: <496246BD.6090308@justinshore.com>
Reply-To: mtinka@globaltransit.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--nextPart2139992.KzHYMgzUH7
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 01:43:25 am Justin Shore wrote:
> I never could get
> IS-IS to work with multiple areas. The 7600s made a
> smelly mess on the CO floor every time I tried. In the
> end I went with a L2-only IS-IS network.
How so?
Cheers,
Mark.
--nextPart2139992.KzHYMgzUH7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)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=KCvc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2139992.KzHYMgzUH7--
