[110214] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3 issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (virendra rode)
Sun Dec 28 15:46:29 2008
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:44:04 -0800
From: virendra rode <virendra.rode@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
In-Reply-To: <63ac96a50812281121r31aabf91s55fde55176d2cb72@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: virendra.rode@gmail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
IMHO, this is exactly what service providers love to hear in order for
them not to be forth coming.
regards,
/virendra
Matthew Petach wrote:
> On 12/28/08, Blake Pfankuch <bpfankuch@cpgreeley.com> wrote:
>> Any word on the actual cause of the issue?
>
> Given the lurking presence of wannabe press vultures here, I
> doubt you'll see anything forthcoming from the technical folks
> about what actually happened. This is not to say that people
> haven't been informed of the issue, it's simply that NANOG is
> no longer a friendly hapy techie-only place where such information
> can be shared without it being seized on and quoted without
> permission by the press.
>
> Bitter? Just a bit, yes. After having what I mentioned here get
> quoted by the press without permission, it's very clear that there
> will be no more technical commentary/feedback/information flow
> through this channel from me or any of the other people at the
> company for which I work, more's the pity. If you can find a
> forum where engineers can share information freely without
> having to worry about being quoted by the press, you might
> try enquiring there. ^_^;
>
> Matt
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJV+UUpbZvCIJx1bcRAoxfAKCFn9inJ1Pq2Z0W9uuu1YeMGjf0LACeJVca
GkejywYfBp2yUjTFJwrOLFU=
=d1BQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
