[110208] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3 issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (marco)
Sun Dec 28 14:11:27 2008
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:11:13 -0800
From: marco <marco@zero11.com>
To: Blake Pfankuch <bpfankuch@cpgreeley.com>
In-Reply-To: <01759D50DC387C45A018FE1817CE27D7540C2B5FE6@CPExchange1.cpgreeley.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Any word on the actual cause of the issue?
>
> From: Derek Bodner [mailto:subscribedlists@derekbodner.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:53 AM
> To: Blake Pfankuch
> Cc: Jon Wolberg; Jason Cheslock; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Level 3 issues
>
> Looks like most providers here in the east coast are routing through level3 again, and I'm not seeing any packet loss or latency anymore.
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch <bpfankuch@cpgreeley.com<mailto:bpfankuch@cpgreeley.com>> wrote:
> Seems to be normalizing here in Colorado as well, however still having occasional packet loss to NY.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Wolberg [mailto:jon@defenderhosting.com<mailto:jon@defenderhosting.com>]
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:40 AM
> To: Jason Cheslock
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Level 3 issues
>
> Confirmed here as well.
>
>
> Jon
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Cheslock" <sangreviento@gmail.com<mailto:sangreviento@gmail.com>>
> To: "marco" <marco@zero11.com<mailto:marco@zero11.com>>
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 1:35:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: Level 3 issues
>
> According to L3, this issue should be fixed and we should start seeing
>
>
>> the traffic normalizing.
>> Can anyone confirm?
>>
>
> Here in Richmond Virginia, everything seems to be back to normal now.
> Traffic coming from my Comcast connection can get through L3 now.
>
>
> 7 11 ms 13 ms 11 ms te-0-3-0-0-cr01.mclean.va.ibone.comcast.net<http://te-0-3-0-0-cr01.mclean.va.ibone.comcast.net> [68.
> 86.91.121]
> 8 10 ms 11 ms 12 ms xe-11-1-0.edge1.Washington1.Level3.net<http://xe-11-1-0.edge1.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.79.231
> .9]
> 9 12 ms 17 ms 18 ms vlan89.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net<http://vlan89.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.68.17.190]
>
> 10 12 ms 17 ms 17 ms ae-84-84.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-84-84.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.69.134.1
> 85]
> 11 16 ms 26 ms 16 ms ae-3-3.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-3-3.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.69.132.94]
> 12 32 ms 30 ms 17 ms ae-81-81.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-81-81.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.69.134.74]
>
> 13 15 ms 19 ms 16 ms ae-3-89.edge1.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-3-89.edge1.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.68.16.142]
>
>
>
> --
> Derek Bodner
> subscribedlists@derekbodner.com<mailto:subscribedlists@derekbodner.com>
>
>From what I heard, it was some some malfunction with a router in
Washington D.C. which terminated a 100GB bundle from Paris. It was
carring about 50GB at the time of the failure.
Not sure why routes within the US would be effected.
