[110172] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Armstrong)
Sat Dec 27 18:45:58 2008
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:45:46 +0000
From: Adam Armstrong <lists@memetic.org>
To: TJ <trejrco@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <002e01c96862$bbe8f520$33badf60$@com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
TJ wrote:
>> ... not to mention that fact that IS-IS is, IMHO, a much nicer IGP to work
>>
> with.
>
> WRT that last sentence, that is an almost religious debate I was trying to
> avoid starting ... :)
>
Well IMHO it's a very important point to consider. This is a great
chance to switch your IGP, if you've ever wanted to. You *need* to
deploy a new one anyways, so it's a great opportunity to see if you can
simplify your network by migrating. Especially as OSPFv3 *isnt* the same
as OSPFv2, so you will have to learn new things either way!
Oh, and I *am* in the process of organising a Crusade to wipe out those
heretical OSPF supporters once and for all... ;)
adam.
