[110153] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sat Dec 27 08:27:18 2008
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 08:27:05 -0500
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net>
In-Reply-To: <200812271833.10233.mtinka@globaltransit.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> For IS-IS, highly recommend MT to avoid any nasties while
> turning up v6 in a dual-stack environment.
as one who has been burned when topologies are not congruent, i gotta
ask. if i do not anticipate v4 and v6 having different topologies, and
all my devices are dual-capable, would you still recommend mt for other
than future-proofing?
randy
