[110000] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: What is the most standard subnet length on internet

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Greco)
Fri Dec 19 10:50:14 2008

From: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
To: patrick@ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:48:50 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <BEFAF8CA-7ED7-47F2-A02F-5D5DEBC0FD88@ianai.net> from "Patrick W.
	Gilmore" at Dec 19, 2008 07:07:08 AM
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> As for routing table size, no router which can handle 10s of Gbps is  
> at all bothered by the size of the global table, 

... as long as it isn't something like a Cisco Catalyst 6509 with SUP720 
and doesn't have a PFC3BXL helping out ...

... or if we conveniently don't classify a Catalyst 65xx as a router
because it was primarily intended as a switch, despite how ISP's commonly
use them ...

> so only edge devices  
> or stub networks are in danger of needing to filter /24s.  And both of  
> those can (should?) have something called a "default route", making it  
> completely irrelevant whether they hear the /24s anyway.

A more accurate statement is probably that "any router that can handle
10s of Gbps is likely to be available in a configuration that is not at
all bothered by the current size of the global table, most likely at some
substantial additional cost."

... JG
-- 
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post