[109922] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jerome Benoit)
Wed Dec 17 04:57:36 2008
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:57:24 +0100
From: Jerome Benoit <jerome.benoit@grenouille.com>
To: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <bb0e440a0812150853w62fe6ef8w3531dcc5ffe61d0e@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--Signature=_Wed__17_Dec_2008_10_57_24_+0100_XJ/Y2QxlThYVsm7B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Le Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:23:24 +0530,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists@gmail.com> a =E9crit :
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu
> <eugen@imacandi.net> wrote:
> > Ubaidali_Abdul_Razack@3com.com wrote:
> >>
> >> Have you tried 3Com's 6040 / MSR-50 routers?
> >
> > No offense / no flame, but really, do you actually compare 3Com
> > with Juniper ?
>=20
> Patriotism :)
>=20
OpenBGPd on OpenBSD worth a try then :)=20
Cheers.
--=20
J=E9r=F4me Benoit aka fraggle
La M=E9t=E9o du Net - http://grenouille.com
OpenPGP Key ID : 9FE9161D
Key fingerprint : 9CA4 0249 AF57 A35B 34B3 AC15 FAA0 CB50 9FE9 161D
--Signature=_Wed__17_Dec_2008_10_57_24_+0100_XJ/Y2QxlThYVsm7B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklIzQQACgkQ+qDLUJ/pFh2s2gCdFFo7qEUsFQPXiiAfc1ssd0tx
ASoAoOsNi8FMNBjqhFm4EL4G1jHbkiyX
=MObB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature=_Wed__17_Dec_2008_10_57_24_+0100_XJ/Y2QxlThYVsm7B--
